Quick Overview

Hello Friends, are you new to mobile development and want to build performance-critical mobile apps? You have created an app take advantage of native APIs, you would need a good resource on learning mobile native development

Today, we will discuss on developing for the mobile application market, an important decision is to decide between developing a native app or a hybrid app one.



  1. Native App Development
  2. Hybrid App Development
  3. Differences between Native and Hybrid app
  4. Can we Development with Another Path?
  5. How to choose the right Development app type


Native App Development

Native apps are the most common type of app. Native apps are developed to perform some specific tasks on a particular mobile operating system. Native apps built using software development tools (SDK) for a certain software framework, hardware platform or operating system. Like Android app built using Java Development Kit on Java platform, iOS app built using iOS SDK, Swift and Objective C. Similarly, .NET required for Windows platform.


Benefits  of Native App

1) Native App Provide a Recognizable Look and Feel

Native apps have the ability to easily access and utilize the built-in capabilities of the user’s device  (e.g., GPS, address book, camera, etcetera). When a user sends text messages, takes pictures using the device’s default app, set reminders, or uses the device’s music app (the one that came with the phone), they’re using native apps.


2) Native App gives a better user experience

The user experience of native apps is far superior to hybrid apps. To the user, the flow is more natural because of each mobile operating system’s specific UI guidelines and standards.


3) Native App Maintain Quality

The native app must be approved by its respective operating system which assures quality, security, and device compatibility.


Disadvantages of Native App Development

1)  Need an experienced Developer

Native apps use programming languages which require experienced developers.


2)Expensive & Time-consuming Development

Expenses are more costly upfront for native apps compared to hybrid apps. Every platform, such as iOS and Android, needs a separate set of codes, which means more time is required, as it is equivalent to coding for two different apps.


3)Not best for Simple application

Native apps are not the best option for simple applications.


Note: While the initial cost of native mobile app development may be higher than other options, this development approach will save money over time. By offering a great user experience, better performance and accessibility, native apps are able to offer users a more personalized product. The multiple advantages of native apps will result in higher conversion rates and long-term customer loyalty.


Native App Development Software


Hybrid App Development

Hybrid app development is essentially a web app that incorporates additional native features. Including native features is possible when you deploy a wrapper to act as a bridge between platforms. A hybrid app consists of two parts:

1)  The backend code. Hybrid code is written in languages like HTML, CSS, or JavaScript.

2)  A native shell. This shell is downloadable and loads the code using a web view.


Advantages of Hybrid App Development

1)Same code for all Platform & reduce Cost

The single code base for all platforms means write once and run anywhere but for native app scenario, we need to build and maintain separate app and code for each platform. The code is written once, which substantially reduces development time and costs compared to native apps which require development for iOS and development for Android.


2)Fast Development

Hybrid apps development is faster and easier to maintain. You can change platforms anytime you need.


3) Code reusable for  website

The same development team can deliver an app for any platform including website as well because all required is web technologies.and also so same app can be run on browser like any other website or can be run as Progressive Web App(PWA).


Disadvantages of Hybrid App Development

1) Not Best for High graphics

For most applications, performance is the same as a native app but 3D, HD games, high graphics-oriented apps and other performance-centric apps, a hybrid approach might not go well.


2) Not provide the best Native Functionality

A hybrid app can access all the native device features like touchId, media, etc. but dependent on native plugins. Sometimes entire new device feature might be not being readily available as a native plugin. We can write our own but it adds complexity to the development.


3) Platform Inconsistencies

With hybrid app development, you have to contend with issues that stem from both native systems and hybrid systems, which makes bug fixing more difficult. The user experience is often sacrificed with a hybrid app as you cannot customize the app based on the platform.


Note: Customizability is a significant disadvantage to hybrid apps. The more customization you do, the more you’re steering toward a native solution. If customization is important to you, taking the native approach to development will be more beneficial. In fact, the more customization you want in your hybrid app, the more expensive the project will be, and therefore a native solution will end up being more cost-effective.


Hybrid  App Development Software


Differences between Native and Hybrid app


Can we Development with Another Path?

if we will create a native app with a single code base. yes it is possible.

With native app development, you have to build different apps for different operating systems.

However, developers have new technology for programming. Three platforms, in particular, Xamarin, React and Flutter  Native can sometimes be classified as other types of native app development.

1) Flutter

Google’s Flutter is mobile app SDK used for developing high-quality native interfaces on Android and iOS. This framework was launched in the year 2018 and works well with existing code. It is an open-source mobile application development platform and using this will help one with the benefits like foundation libraries, widgets, and more. Flutter is fast and also helps one with the development of cross-platform applications.


2) React Native

Developed in the year of 2015, React Native has become the best substitute for building captive solutions. It was Facebook, who brought in this amazing platform for building applications like never before. There is no need for separate iOS and Android teams while using React Native framework. This framework makes coding easier for developers allowing them to build interactive mobile applications for both iOS and Android platforms, with a single JavaScript codebase. Applications developed with React Native framework are second to none as you get easy and attractive user interface to native modules in the bank. Applications like Uber Eats, Instagram, and even Bloomberg, are good examples of it.

3) Xamarin

Xamarin is a Microsoft-owned San Francisco California-based software company founded in May 2011 which has cross-platform implementations of the Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) and Common Language Specifications (often called Microsoft .NET). With a C# shared codebase, developers can use Xamarin tools to write native Android, iOS, and Windows apps with native user interfaces and share code across multiple platforms, including Windows and macOS. Xamarin is the top hybrid mobile app development framework. It saves your time regarding re-utilizing abilities, tools, teams and the best significant part is code. You can influence the array of Xamarin and Android APIs as well as design an amazing experience for glass with the Android SDK and GDK.


How to choose the right Development app type

Before deciding to develop app type, an organization will have to take into account a certain number of factors in order to launch a digital product that brings its future user’s full satisfaction and the expected business results.


How will our users access the application?

Should it be available in App Stores?

Do we need to update it frequently?

What is the level of complexity of the functionalities that we wish to develop?

Do we need to use the devices’ native functionalities?

What kind of user experience do we wish to offer?

What are our development resources?